Lionsgate: The Dead
- Svevan
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 7:49 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Lionsgate: The Dead
Those caps look a LOT better than my old R2 Network DVD (which I cannot cap on my Mac, unfortunately; unless there's a trick I don't know). Here's hoping for a comparison from someone like Beaver to verify, as my memory could be faulty. Also, the old DVD was PAL and seemed to be running at varying speeds throughout (voices would be high-pitched then semi-normal, etc), though that could be due to my over-sensitivity to PAL speed-up and nothing else.
- MoonlitKnight
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:44 pm
Re: Lionsgate: The Dead
Eh, it's hardly the first DVD that's been released with an inaccurate running time listed on the back.jaredsap wrote:Interesting. My new packaging definitely says 83 minutes so let's indeed hope this corrected packaging will soon be found in stores...Cronenfly wrote:I'm positive that it's the right version (it runs a full 83 minutes); perhaps (hopefully) the one I got is just an anomaly? I purchased it in-store, and there was a post-it note on the display copy indicating that it was the corrected version, despite what the packaging and disc say.
-
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:24 am
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Lionsgate: The Dead
Have you been following the whole discussion? The crucial point here is that unless Lionsgate gets the corrected packaging into stores, there's no way to tell the cut from uncut editions on retailer shelves.MoonlitKnight wrote:Eh, it's hardly the first DVD that's been released with an inaccurate running time listed on the back.
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Re: Lionsgate: The Dead
I use Snapz Pro X, but I have a professional excuse for paying for it.Svevan wrote:Those caps look a LOT better than my old R2 Network DVD (which I cannot cap on my Mac, unfortunately; unless there's a trick I don't know).
- MoonlitKnight
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:44 pm
Re: Lionsgate: The Dead
Seeing as they supposedly recalled all copies of the botched version (it was completely unavailable at Deep Discount until 12/8), I'm willing to take the chance.jaredsap wrote:Have you been following the whole discussion? The crucial point here is that unless Lionsgate gets the corrected packaging into stores, there's no way to tell the cut from uncut editions on retailer shelves.MoonlitKnight wrote:Eh, it's hardly the first DVD that's been released with an inaccurate running time listed on the back.