Edward Yang

Discussion and info on people in film, ranging from directors to actors to cinematographers to writers.
Post Reply
Message
Author
PimpPanda
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:47 pm

Re: Edward Yang

#51 Post by PimpPanda » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:38 pm

denti alligator wrote:Mulvaney confirmed (via email to board member -- see "forthcoming" thread) that Brighter Summer Day is indeed coming as a Criterion title.
So there is a God.

User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:59 pm
Location: Upstate NY

Re: Edward Yang

#52 Post by Murdoch » Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:15 am

Words cannot express my joy, so here is something else: \:D/

User avatar
bearcuborg
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 2:30 am
Location: Philadelphia via Chicago

Re: Edward Yang

#53 Post by bearcuborg » Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:21 am

Great news, I guess I can delete my downloaded version...I only watched 35 minutes of it so far.

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

Re: Edward Yang

#54 Post by zedz » Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:43 pm

Some more information on the restoration which it seems is not (yet) complete, courtesy Kent Jones (at Dave Kehr's blog):
Kent Jones wrote:There is still some more work to do on the restoration of A BRIGHTER SUMMER DAY. The shorter cut exists as a negative, but the pieces comprising the longer cut exist only as an I.P. And, as of Cannes, 5 minutes in reel 7 had yet to be located. In progress.
So the Criterion edition may not exactly be imminent. On the other hand, this does suggest that it would be relatively straightforward for Criterion to issue both cuts, which would be astonishing if it happened.

User avatar
Cronenfly
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:04 pm

Re: Edward Yang

#55 Post by Cronenfly » Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:31 am

Well, I'm guardedly optimistic that Criterion will include both cuts, given the precedents: Brazil, Fanny and Alexander, Scenes From A Marriage, The Leopard, Mr. Arkadin, The Last Emperor...although A Brighter Summer Day is somewhat more obscure than any of those, barring Mr. Arkadin (which was fortunate enough to have the Welles hook). Still, I remain hopeful that a 3-disc set with both cuts is what the end product will turn out to be.

User avatar
Tom Amolad
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:30 pm
Location: New York

Re: Edward Yang

#56 Post by Tom Amolad » Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:11 am

Cronenfly wrote:Well, I'm guardedly optimistic that Criterion will include both cuts, given the precedents: Brazil, Fanny and Alexander, Scenes From A Marriage, The Leopard, Mr. Arkadin, The Last Emperor...although A Brighter Summer Day is somewhat more obscure than any of those, barring Mr. Arkadin (which was fortunate enough to have the Welles hook). Still, I remain hopeful that a 3-disc set with both cuts is what the end product will turn out to be.
But does anyone actually think the three-hour cut is in any way interesting in its own right? I haven't seen it, but I've never heard anyone say they liked it better. (Anyone want to put up a defense of it?) And unlike most of the films you mention, it's not as if the shorter version is already well-known. (The theatrical version of "Fanny and Alexander," say, whether or not its director liked it, was a major part of film history when the DVD came out.)

User avatar
Jun-Dai
監督
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 4:34 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Edward Yang

#57 Post by Jun-Dai » Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:22 am

Is there any reason to include both cuts? I'd think you'd want to have a pretty strong reason before making the package that much bigger and more expensive, but I don't know anything about the history of alternate versions of A Brighter Summer Day.

User avatar
Cronenfly
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:04 pm

Re: Edward Yang

#58 Post by Cronenfly » Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:10 am

Refer to zedz's post about the two versions on the first page of this thread; it doesn't sound as if the shorter version is radically different in any way, but I think that it would make for a fascinating look at a more narratively economical version of the film, as zedz suggetss. And if both versions are available to Criterion, I see no reason not to bump the set from 2 to 3 discs/39.99 to 49.99 MSRP, especially if additional supplements are not easy to come by.

ptmd
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:12 pm

Re: Edward Yang

#59 Post by ptmd » Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:53 am

I've seen both cuts and there's absolutely no reason to include the shorter one. It's a commercial compromise that Yang never wanted to make and which has no real existence outside a few markets close to Taiwan. In France and Britain, they always showed the complete version and in the US the film has never had a commercial release, so you can't make a case for it the way you can with, say, Touch of Evil. I think including the shorter cut would be a waste of money and time that would almost certainly push up the cost of the set (since another disc would be required).

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Edward Yang

#60 Post by swo17 » Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:10 pm

If the shorter cut is only different in that certain parts of the longer cut have been excised (and I don't know if this is the case) couldn't they just use branching to give us two cuts in one?

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Edward Yang

#61 Post by domino harvey » Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:53 pm

zedz wrote:So the Criterion edition may not exactly be imminent.
Except that for the last few years, Criterion has rarely if ever confirmed a title that didn't come out pretty soon thereafter. Maybe they're working on the extras now while waiting for the print to be restored

ianungstad
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:20 pm

Re: Edward Yang

#62 Post by ianungstad » Fri Jun 12, 2009 4:12 pm

I wouldn't make that assumption. You had the press release from Cannes which stated that Criterion was releasing this film along with the other dozen or so projects worked on by Scorsese's World Cinema Foundation. There would be no point in Mulvaney denying a title after the news has been published in a widely available press release and most likely already read by everyone on the board. In my email, he simply said that they had plans to release the film but had no plans for Losey's Accident, no time frame was mentioned.

I also don't see your statement about Mulvaney confirmations meaning a title is coming soon being true. Last I checked they've issued press releases and confirmations for Insignificance, Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence, rereleases of Naked Kiss, Shock Corridor, Walkabout, Greenaway's Cook, Thief, Wife, Lover, White Mane, Red Balloon, Scorsese short films, Maysles shorts, etc. that have all been "announced" over a year ago with still no release dates in sight. I think even the recently solicited Human Condition was originally "confirmed" by Mulvaney something like 2 and a half years ago? That Gorin set that your anxious for has also been announced ages ago with nothing on the horizon.

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

Re: Edward Yang

#63 Post by zedz » Fri Jun 12, 2009 4:34 pm

swo17 wrote:If the shorter cut is only different in that certain parts of the longer cut have been excised (and I don't know if this is the case) couldn't they just use branching to give us two cuts in one?
This is what I was hoping for. I don't see any need for the shorter cut to get its own disc. (Actually, even if they documented what footage comprised the short cut so you could manually reconstruct it, that would be valuable).

What I find most interesting about the shorter cut is how little is actually left out, since Yang condenses the story rather than excising significant parts of it. Since Yang's handling of narrative ellipses and use of indirect narration are among his most interesting characteristics as a filmmaker, and since the shorter edit is the director's, not the producer's, the option of a side-by-side comparison would be quite valuable. But as I said, I'm not holding my breath. It was only the indication that the short edit material is from a better source than the rest of the film that made it even seem like a possibility.

User avatar
Cronenfly
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:04 pm

Re: Edward Yang

#64 Post by Cronenfly » Fri Jun 12, 2009 7:43 pm

Has Criterion ever released a DVD with seamless branching, though? There's always a first time, of course, but I can’t remember any examples, and they didn’t do it for In the Realm of the Senses recently even though it would have made sense to do so. My prediction is that it’ll be on a third disc or not at all, and I’m feeling the latter is more likely (which I have to admit makes sense, seeing as the shorter version wasn’t something Yang wanted to have to create/is not a radically different edit of the film). Personally I feel the extra $10 is worth it, but I admit the prospect seems dubious/can understand why others feel including the shorter edit would be pointless.

nemosama
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 9:14 pm

Re: Edward Yang

#65 Post by nemosama » Fri Apr 16, 2010 7:34 am



User avatar
Tom Amolad
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:30 pm
Location: New York

Re: Edward Yang

#67 Post by Tom Amolad » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:01 pm

With, it appears, a full week of A Brighter Summer Day at one of their new releases theaters.

User avatar
godardslave
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:44 pm
Location: Confusing and open ended = high art.

Re: Edward Yang

#68 Post by godardslave » Fri Oct 28, 2011 6:21 pm

If Criterion release a blu boxset of Yang in 2012, that would be :D .

Perkins Cobb
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:49 pm

Re: Edward Yang

#69 Post by Perkins Cobb » Fri Oct 28, 2011 6:40 pm

Tom Amolad wrote:With, it appears, a full week of A Brighter Summer Day at one of their new releases theaters.
Which are kinda small ... would be nice if they screen it in the Walter Reade once. Otherwise it'll get shortchanged, despite the welcome exposure.

User avatar
denti alligator
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"

Re: Edward Yang

#70 Post by denti alligator » Fri Oct 28, 2011 6:42 pm

Not living in NYC anymore sucks. Sometimes.

Now's one of them times.

Perkins Cobb
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:49 pm

Re: Edward Yang

#71 Post by Perkins Cobb » Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:36 pm

Oops: Several of the key films (especially That Day on the Beach and The Terrorizers) are showing digitally. At least they've snagged a print for In Our Time, which screened digitally in that overview of Taiwanese cinema that FSLC did earlier this year.

J Adams
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:28 pm

Re: Edward Yang

#72 Post by J Adams » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:57 am

ALL of those films exist in 35mm with subtitles. Someone in NY (I think MoMA) did a Yang retro eons ago. Admittedly the prints were a bit ragged. Thanks for the digital warning. I'll be skipping those.

Perkins Cobb
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:49 pm

Re: Edward Yang

#73 Post by Perkins Cobb » Mon Oct 31, 2011 2:29 pm

It was Anthology, some time ago (before Yang died), and my memory is that some films were announced but then cancelled after prints couldn't be obtained. Harvard and one of the L.A. venues did a full Yang retro a few years ago but I don't know whether they were all film (and they've played other non-U.S. cities since, so the same prints may be even more ragged). I'm a little disappointed too, but I'm willing to bet that the FSLC staff had a good reason for taking digital over film, if they even had the option. I suspect I'll be there for these (probably excepting The Terrorizers, since there's a Blu-ray).

J Adams
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:28 pm

Re: Edward Yang

#74 Post by J Adams » Mon Oct 31, 2011 2:45 pm

At least most of them are in 35 so I will give them credit for that. The retro I'm thinking of was a LONG time ago--mid to late 90s.

User avatar
ando
Bringing Out El Duende
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Edward Yang

#75 Post by ando » Mon Oct 31, 2011 4:56 pm

denti alligator wrote:
Not living in NYC anymore sucks. Sometimes.

Now's one of them times.
Heh. Thanks for the heads up. I didn't even know he died. I was pretty impressed with YiYi but watched it at home. It'll be nice to see it on a large screen (assuming it's The Walter Reade Theater).

Post Reply