'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

A subforum to discuss film culture and criticism.
Post Reply
Message
Author
Napoleon
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:55 am

#101 Post by Napoleon » Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:43 am

Real dross is Michelangelo Antonioni's The Passenger...
The reviewer doesn't seem like a complete idiot, he uses proper sentence and everything, but then falls into the "I didn't like it but I'm right and therefore everyone else is wrong" school of film criticism.

You get a lot of this with Antonioni.

Like Dan Schneider's review of L'Avventura.

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

#102 Post by MichaelB » Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:51 am

kinjitsu wrote:Michael, it's an old forum joke.
Ah. So it is.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

#103 Post by domino harvey » Wed Mar 21, 2007 11:11 am

Dan Schneider wrote:I wish some of the money spent on the restoration could have been used to hire competent actors to dub the film into English. No DVD of quality should lack this feature.
ding ding ding, we have a winner

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm

#104 Post by Matt » Wed Mar 21, 2007 11:42 am

This thread, and the discovery that one of the faculty at the college I work for has read one of my ancient Amazon reviews, has made me go through and delete most of them.

neal
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 11:44 pm
Location: NY, USA

#105 Post by neal » Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:53 pm

kinjitsu wrote:
MichaelB wrote:Would the person who retitled this thread care to take another look at what it's currently called? If only to avoid redicule?
Michael, it's an old forum joke.
Shouldn't it read "Rediculous Costumer & Critic Reviews?"

scalesojustice
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 11:25 am
Contact:

#106 Post by scalesojustice » Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:21 pm

don't ask me why i was on the amazon page for "National Lampoon's Van Wilder: The Rise of Taj," but this is what i found:
Ahead of it's time,
Reviewer: A customer
When I first saw this movie on American Movie Classics I thought-Oh no-another dated melodrama. I was wrong. This movie grabbed me as none has since Roots. Indeed it is an epic film. It was delightful to see many of the stars of that era showcased in a powerful and interesting story. This is a story stong on action and romance. The actors deliver. The bad guys are reeeally bad. The heroines beautiful and tragic and the heroes doomed. Sound like real life? Wash away your troubles in this fine film-enjoy

Cinesimilitude
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:43 am

#107 Post by Cinesimilitude » Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:42 pm

scalesojustice wrote:don't ask me why i was on the amazon page for "National Lampoon's Van Wilder: The Rise of Taj," but this is what i found:
Ahead of it's time,
Reviewer: A customer
When I first saw this movie on American Movie Classics I thought-Oh no-another dated melodrama. I was wrong. This movie grabbed me as none has since Roots. Indeed it is an epic film. It was delightful to see many of the stars of that era showcased in a powerful and interesting story. This is a story stong on action and romance. The actors deliver. The bad guys are reeeally bad. The heroines beautiful and tragic and the heroes doomed. Sound like real life? Wash away your troubles in this fine film-enjoy
That ambiguous review is most certainly not for Van Wilder 2.

User avatar
Saarijas
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:03 pm
Location: CT
Contact:

#108 Post by Saarijas » Sat Mar 24, 2007 1:08 am

My favorite amazon review is for Fences the Pulitzer prize winning play by August Wilson.
Ryan Michel
Mr. Cawn
Sophomore lit

I thought this book was good because it related life to baseball. This book started off slow like most books, but then it got better. It was kind of hard to read because of the improper English and the slang termination. I liked how that the book was related to my life, because I love baseball. You would too if you play baseball or was a baseball player. I did not understand why they called it fences. I think they could have named the book something different, or emphasized the fences part. This book was good, but it got kind of confusing reading it by my self and not as a play. I would recommend reading this book as a class or with a group of people but I would have to worn you, it uses the "N" bomb a lot."
If he did do it for an assigment I hope he failed, failed miserably. How could he miss why they called it Fences, and I just assume he didn't read it, but even so. Christ he wrote it as if he were a 6th grader.

User avatar
jorencain
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:45 am

#109 Post by jorencain » Sat Mar 24, 2007 7:39 am

Saarijas wrote:If he did do it for an assigment I hope he failed, failed miserably. How could he miss why they called it Fences, and I just assume he didn't read it, but even so. Christ he wrote it as if he were a 6th grader.
At least he got most of his "termination" right.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

#110 Post by domino harvey » Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:05 pm

This one is amazing. Let's play a game. Guess what film this RottenTomatoes blurb is for, then highlight the spoiler text to be schooled in astonishment.

Image
SpoilerShow
TMNT

User avatar
The Fanciful Norwegian
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:24 pm
Location: Teegeeack

#111 Post by The Fanciful Norwegian » Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:36 pm

Following up on The Host thread, I've found Armond's kindred spirit, and he works for the Richmond Times-Dispatch:
Writer-director Bong Joon-ho tries to keep the tone light, or at least confusing, with his use of comedy that just feels inappropriate. Slapstick in a horror film can't possibly work (unless you're Abbott and Costello, and rarely then), and the other jokes are equally out of place.
To be fair, Armond probably has better way with words, but then he didn't come up with "Codzilla" or "Seoul food."

User avatar
Kinsayder
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: UK

#112 Post by Kinsayder » Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:42 pm

domino harvey wrote:Guess what film this RottenTomatoes blurb is for
I Google-cheated.

User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

#113 Post by cdnchris » Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:31 am

domino harvey wrote:This one is amazing. Let's play a game. Guess what film this RottenTomatoes blurb is for, then highlight the spoiler text to be schooled in astonishment.

Image
I jokingly guessed to myself and was sad when I was right.

User avatar
Doctor Sunshine
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:04 pm
Location: Brain Jail

#114 Post by Doctor Sunshine » Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:08 pm

cdnchris wrote:I jokingly guessed to myself and was sad when I was right.
Say that again after you've seen it. It rocks harder than the Flavor of Green Tea Over Rice!

User avatar
Lemmy Caution
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:26 am
Location: East of Shanghai

#115 Post by Lemmy Caution » Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:33 am

Speaking of Triumph of the Will, I was reading a review of Reifenstahl's The Holy Mountain on IMDb, and one person wrote:
"Basically it is a mellow drama."
I'm going to have to start using that.

User avatar
John Cope
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:40 pm
Location: where the simulacrum is true

#116 Post by John Cope » Sat Apr 14, 2007 1:29 am

Here's one I just couldn't resist posting. For Bart Freundlich's Myth of Fingerprints:
Reviewer: Michael Bolts (superior, wiusa) - See all my reviews
lots of love making in this one. Wyle gives a great role as the son of a father and their lives arent really great as Wyle comes back after he is gone for awhile. Roy Schider is great too as Wyle's dad. people will note if there Alias fans that Michael Vartan of Alias is in this movie. powerful piece with some dry emotions.
"The son of a father". That's got to be some kind of new standard setter.

Cinesimilitude
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:43 am

#117 Post by Cinesimilitude » Sat Apr 14, 2007 1:54 am

he does a review of a movie that contains moving pictures and sound quite well for a reviewer.

User avatar
dx23
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Puerto Rico

#118 Post by dx23 » Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:29 pm

Review for Walking Tall 2: The Payback at IMDB.com:
almost film-noir movie, 16 March 2007

Author: albrit from Russian Federation

So, what I gotta say. There were three movies named "walking tall" back to the 70's, dedicated the cherished memory of Sheriff Buford Pusser, God bless his soul. Good old touching movies. And there was a re-make of Walking Tall in 2004, that one with some guy called "The Rock" playing main character (one of the worst movies I ever saw). So, after watching this movie of 2007 I have to say that it's a even a greater pity that movie with "The Rock" guy was ever created. Because only THIS one could be called as a worthy continuer of "Walking Tall" series. It has a genuine atmosphere, excellent colors, good acting and a lot of sincerity. It even has some traces of film-noir, and that is especially good. Honest and sincere movie about good and evil ones.
Almost film noir? WTF?

User avatar
Forrest Taft
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:34 pm
Location: Stavanger, Norway

#119 Post by Forrest Taft » Mon Apr 16, 2007 4:10 pm

Every positive review of 300

User avatar
Poncho Punch
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:07 pm
Location: the emerald empire

#120 Post by Poncho Punch » Thu May 03, 2007 4:50 pm

NEXT (imdb)

Completely Unpredictable, 30 April 2007
8/10
Author: springsunnywinter from United Kingdom

Nicolas Cage has proved once again after Ghost Rider that he is a terrific actor and his films are always good. He is certainly one of my favourite actors & the whole film was taken care by him because it is very complicated to act like someone who has the ability to see into the future. The movie had a really good story about Cris Johnson (Nicolas Cage) who can see 2 minutes into the future very clearly and the police needed his help to stop a terrorist attack who had threaten to detonate a nuclear bomb in Los Angeles killing millions of people. The best thing about the film is that you don't know which scene is in the present or the future, so it is completely unpredictable right from start to end. Action was also really good but the film was a bit slow if it picked up the pace then I would of given it a 9 or even a 10 out of 10. Overall 8/10 & Ghost Rider was better!

User avatar
miless
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:45 pm

#121 Post by miless » Thu May 03, 2007 9:38 pm

Poncho Punch wrote:NEXT (imdb)

Completely Unpredictable, 30 April 2007
8/10
Author: springsunnywinter from United Kingdom

Nicolas Cage has proved once again after Ghost Rider that he is a terrific actor and his films are always good. He is certainly one of my favourite actors & the whole film was taken care by him because it is very complicated to act like someone who has the ability to see into the future. The movie had a really good story about Cris Johnson (Nicolas Cage) who can see 2 minutes into the future very clearly and the police needed his help to stop a terrorist attack who had threaten to detonate a nuclear bomb in Los Angeles killing millions of people. The best thing about the film is that you don't know which scene is in the present or the future, so it is completely unpredictable right from start to end. Action was also really good but the film was a bit slow if it picked up the pace then I would of given it a 9 or even a 10 out of 10. Overall 8/10 & Ghost Rider was better!
yet another reason to disregard IMDB's rating system.

User avatar
reaky
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:53 am
Location: Cambridge, England

#122 Post by reaky » Sat May 05, 2007 5:41 am

The best thing about the film is that you don't know which scene is in the present or the future, so it is completely unpredictable right from start to end.
Ah - the author has clearly seen Wong Kar-Wai's 2046 and confused it with a Nic Cage action flick.

Commander Shears
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:17 pm

#123 Post by Commander Shears » Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:41 pm

from Amazon.com, regarding Roots:
All Fiction, June 21, 2007
By Billyclo (Philly , PA United States) - See all my reviews

It'd be interesting if slavery ever happened...but it's all made up to make people feel bad. Do we have any real evidence of it happening? No. Any pictures? No.

It's about time people stop acting like this stuff happened

flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

#124 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:43 pm

Commander Shears wrote:from Amazon.com, regarding Roots:
All Fiction, June 21, 2007
By Billyclo (Philly , PA United States) - See all my reviews

It'd be interesting if slavery ever happened...but it's all made up to make people feel bad. Do we have any real evidence of it happening? No. Any pictures? No.

It's about time people stop acting like this stuff happened
I'd love to hear this guy's thoughts on Schindler's List.

User avatar
miless
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:45 pm

#125 Post by miless » Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:46 pm

All Fiction, June 21, 2007
By Billyclo (Philly , PA United States) - See all my reviews

It'd be interesting if slavery ever happened...but it's all made up to make people feel bad. Do we have any real evidence of it happening? No. Any pictures? No.

It's about time people stop acting like this stuff happened
How goddamned ridiculous. (I bet he also doesn't believe in the Holocaust... any pictures... no, probably not... just millions of feet of American/Nazi/British/French film)

Post Reply