Discussions of specific films and franchises.
-
R0lf
- Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 7:25 am
#276
Post
by R0lf » Tue Feb 20, 2018 6:28 pm
mfunk9786 wrote:R0lf wrote:Isn't it the point of the movie that the clothing is all outrageously ugly?
That the entire thing is a comedy of manners?
No?
It may seem that way to us because it's 2018, but in its time and place it absolutely isn't. You might want to inform
everyone who worked on the costumes that it's all a big joke, they certainly don't seem in on it.
At the same time I'll inform the award winning costume team behind PRISCILLA QUEEN OF THE DESERT that their designs were all in deliberate good taste.
Design to the dialogue; I think it's strange the Oscar critic who called the gowns frumpy/unimaginative/unflattering/ugly somehow missed that that was also the narrative in the movie.
-
mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
#277
Post
by mfunk9786 » Tue Feb 20, 2018 7:04 pm
The dialogue indicates that the clothing is all outrageously ugly?
-
Big Ben
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
- Location: Great Falls, Montana
#278
Post
by Big Ben » Tue Feb 20, 2018 7:05 pm
R0lf wrote:Design to the dialogue; I think it's strange the Oscar critic who called the gowns frumpy/unimaginative/unflattering/ugly somehow missed that that was also the narrative in the movie.
Seeing as these publications have only been posting the hottest steaming takes from anonymous voters it actually makes a lot of sense that it's there.
-
R0lf
- Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 7:25 am
#279
Post
by R0lf » Wed Feb 21, 2018 12:21 am
mfunk9786 wrote:The dialogue indicates that the clothing is all outrageously ugly?
Maybe I read the scene where Woodcock shrieks how bad the dress design is before collapsing on it too literally?
-
mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
#280
Post
by mfunk9786 » Wed Feb 21, 2018 1:18 am
I’d contend that you did.
-
HinkyDinkyTruesmith
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2017 10:21 pm
#281
Post
by HinkyDinkyTruesmith » Wed Feb 21, 2018 1:25 am
He doesn't shriek that the dress is bad, he looks it over and mutters that it's not very good, despite the good work his employees put in.
-
Ribs
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:14 pm
#283
Post
by Ribs » Thu Mar 08, 2018 3:46 pm
mfunk9786 wrote:There is a UHD listing on Amazon UK with no release date now
I am seeing it suggested on Twitter by people with far more knowledge of the UK home video market that preordering this, despite it being [in essence] a placeholder, will increase the odds and speed with which it becomes a reality. Even if you don't have a 4K Blu-ray player - if you love this film, I hope you'd consider placing a risk-free preorder just to get the numbers to tick up. Would love to see it actually released, and apparently there is a precedent of Universal releasing 4K titles overseas months before they do so in the US in some cases.
And UHD/4K Blu-ray is completely region free.
So yeah, that's my pitch! Pre-order it! Do it for................. me! And other people!
Apparently, the UHD is back on for the US, and will be announced formally soon. So... I guess we won?
-
mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
#284
Post
by mfunk9786 » Thu Mar 08, 2018 4:38 pm
Hell yes!
Street date is listed as May 8th per Universal
-
mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
#285
Post
by mfunk9786 » Mon Mar 26, 2018 10:47 am
-
Roger Ryan
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city
#287
Post
by Roger Ryan » Thu Mar 29, 2018 8:53 am
That must be from the "For The Hungry Boy" extra! I can't imagine that brief bit of improv would have ever been seriously considered for inclusion as it would have upset the balance between Reynolds and Cyril for the remainder of the film. Still, it looks like everyone is having fun; must have been early in the shoot before things turned morose.
-
MoonlitKnight
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:44 pm
#288
Post
by MoonlitKnight » Thu Mar 29, 2018 11:21 am
And meanwhile we'll likely never see the pie fight scene from "Dr. Strangelove"...
-
bearcuborg
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 2:30 am
- Location: Philadelphia via Chicago
#289
Post
by bearcuborg » Thu Mar 29, 2018 1:41 pm
I caught this during its last showing here in Philadelphia-I remember liking the music quite a bit. Foolish Heart was used nicely. I’m pretty sure I heard Revel, Brahms and maybe Weill. The fashion was glorious too. It might be the first PTA film I liked after seeing it...
With Tavernier’s documentary in mind, I saw a lot of Jacques Becker in this one.
-
DarkImbecile
- Ask me about my visible cat breasts
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:24 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
#291
Post
by DarkImbecile » Mon Apr 09, 2018 7:55 pm
-
Big Ben
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
- Location: Great Falls, Montana
#292
Post
by Big Ben » Mon Apr 09, 2018 8:32 pm
The response to this in my bubble has been downright dismissive
especially from women. It's an absolutely ridiculous article.
-
ianthemovie
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:51 am
- Location: Boston, MA
-
Contact:
#293
Post
by ianthemovie » Mon Apr 09, 2018 8:53 pm
A friend of mine--whose opinion on film I typically admire--posted this to Facebook, much to my bafflement. I was absolutely astonished by its ridiculous generalizations and assumptions. So...Phantom Thread is comparable to Communist-era propaganda? And its misogyny is on par with that of real-life serial predators/rapists like Harvey Weinstein? I don't even know where to begin with the claim that Apocalypse Now, The Green Berets, and the films of Kathryn Bigelow somehow all represent Hollywood studio filmmaking (and therefore dominant ideology) in equal measure. Barf.
-
Big Ben
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
- Location: Great Falls, Montana
#294
Post
by Big Ben » Mon Apr 09, 2018 9:01 pm
Yeah I totally "loved" Kathryn Bigolow's Zero Dark Thirty which she changed because it hurt the CIA's feelings. Totally normal thing to do. But yeah there's a difference between being churlish and being a rapist. I mean what the fuck? And this article was written by a man for those who missed it. And that was what really annoyed the women I saw who derided the piece. They thought it was not only flat out wrong but that it was rather disingenuous for a man in this capacity to be telling them what they should be thinking.
-
domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
#296
Post
by domino harvey » Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:20 pm
This is the first major studio release in the US I've seen use a clear case too
-
mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
#297
Post
by mfunk9786 » Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:47 pm
That was also the cover of the 70mm program. Lovely, even though this is a weirdly difficult film to do really great poster/home video art for
-
John Shade
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:04 pm
#298
Post
by John Shade » Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:53 pm
Sadly I missed this in theaters, should I wait it out and get the 4K?
-
mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
#299
Post
by mfunk9786 » Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:26 pm
If you have a way to play the disc I don’t see why you wouldn’t
-
hearthesilence
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
- Location: NYC
#300
Post
by hearthesilence » Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:29 pm
mfunk9786 wrote:That was also the cover of the 70mm program. Lovely, even though this is a weirdly difficult film to do really great poster/home video art for